You have some job openings at your company or maybe you’re thinking of promoting people to new positions. You’ve winnowed that stack of resumes down to some promising candidates. Now it’s nitty gritty time: background checks.
“If a tree falls in a forest and no one’s around to hear it, does it make a sound?” Law enforcers often ask themselves a similar question: “If a lawsuit reaches final judgment without concrete protections in place for the future, does it have any impact?” That explains the FTC’s keen interest in remedies with the teeth necessary to do the job. Simply put, when it comes to consumer protection, it’s all about the order.
Hmm. Escape for a few days at the beach or burn the midnight oil to meet the impending deadline for comments about the FTC’s guidance document, Dot Com Disclosures: Information About Online Advertising? No need to make that choice now that the Commission has extended the deadline for comments to Wednesday, August 10, 2011.
Yes, it’s a global marketplace, but geography still matters. Misrepresentations about where a company is based can have significant implications for buyers. That’s the message of an FTC settlement announced today against a California online retailer that allegedly deceived British consumers into thinking it was a “hometown operation” by falsely using a .co.uk website.